ALTERNATIVE SHAKESPEARE
"Teaching Macbeth to Children"

As part of the Alternative Shakespeare course at the University of Sheffield, we had to teach Shakespeare to students at a local primary school. This web page contains our research report.

Click here to return back to the multimedia journal.


The report:


INTRODUCTION



OUR FIRST THOUGHTS

The prospect of peer tutoring, and guiding a class of thirty ten year olds through a productive exploration of Shakespeare was a particularly challenging one. We expected the children to be intimidated by any reference to Shakespeare. Our attitude towards the learning capacity of children was therefore grounded upon the notion that the children would only learn if they enjoyed Shakespeare. We based our subsequent catalogue of activities on the intention of facilitating reciprocal enjoyment, discovery, and achievement between ourselves and the children.

THE POTENTIAL FOR A PRODUCTIVE UNION

Initially, we located two dominant areas which we considered to hold great potential for leading the children into the realms of understanding and appreciating Shakespeare. The first of these is harboured within the child itself, for at the age of ten a child is essentially young enough to retain a naïve enthusiasm for anything new, not having reached the stage of potential adolescent apathy, but is also perhaps old enough to have obtained a degree of academic maturity and self control. A combination of these qualities creates the receptive nature in children of that age which, if presented with fresh ideas and varied methods of study, we felt would overcome much of the intimidating stigma attached to the prospect of an in-depth encounter with a Shakespeare play. The largely educated and privileged backgrounds of the children at Nether Green School would, we felt, also assist in precipitating this process.

The other dominant area for a potentially invigorating union between primary school children and a study of Shakespeare, lies in the context of the plays themselves. Many elements of thematic content, structure, and characterisation in Shakespeare's plays have a child-like resonance. This can be observed surprisingly in some of the language within the text, which though superficially difficult, does have a rich, fluid and creative depth to it which revels in its own sounds and rhythms in a way that a child may appreciate. An adult, may in part neglect the importance of this phenomenon, due to continually searching for the meaning behind the words rather than stopping to enjoy them in their own right. It should be stressed that we, as teachers, attempted to reflect upon the idea of 'children as teacher' by describing how our views of Shakespeare changed. This provided the initial rationale behind choosing Macbeth as an appropriate play to focus upon, for indeed we then began to locate other areas within the play that were relevant to a child's experience. The basic emotions of the characters were a particularly prominent example of this, for instance: selfish desires, envy, inferiority, guilt and betrayal, are all feelings that children encounter as acutely as adults and are indeed often especially associated with their experience. Macbeth therefore, would not only send the children on a journey that investigated familiar emotions, but would also offer the stimulus for commenting on the effects and implications of these emotions. The text also utilises fairy-tale structures and plots, thus combining real human emotions with the realms of fantasy; an amalgamation that children can easily relate to as it formulates the basis upon which much of their imaginative playing time is built. In addition, this gives rise to the conception of performance, acting and role-play as being important aspects of child's play. Consequently, the conception of a performance that stems from the very nature of a play, can therefore relate directly and easily to the children's own experience of creative role-play.

The implication of these factors, therefore, is that Shakespeare is potentially a subject that can not only be appreciated and understood by children, but one which would in fact become enhanced by their involvement with it; bringing out the base child-like issues and naiveté that exist within a play like Macbeth, by having them scrutinised through the activities of the children themselves.

OTHER AREAS TO CONSIDER

In order to realise this potential however, it was first necessary for us to channel our own experiences of Shakespeare into a focus and manner of teaching that accommodates

We decided that a concentration upon the elements within Macbeth, that we had already established as being potentially appealing to the children, would therefore be an appropriate focal point for our activities with the children. These issues of language, characters, story, and performance are each capable of stimulating ideas for interpretation and discussion that children will be able to understand but also learn from.

We shall now describe our understanding of the significance of these issues in more detail:

In addition to these focal points however, we felt that the methods used for exploring these aspects of Macbeth would be just as much a key to achieving an exciting, interesting and accommodating tutoring programme, as the subjects of that exploration. Indeed the incitement of motivation and the maintaining of concentration would probably be gained most effectively through the type of activity the children engage in. Therefore we aimed to base our teaching methods on variety, by using a number of different forms of Art and media to investigate and express ideas within Macbeth. We hoped to offer an experience of Shakespeare based on a myriad of different ways of understanding, expressing and creating it. This produced a learning process whereby a broad perception of Macbeth was encouraged together with an understanding of its numerous applications and meanings. Therefore, the mediums used for this purpose would also become an important part of the learning process, and whilst discovering the significations of the play they would also be acquiring and practising skills in creative expression; both in relation to Shakespeare and in their own right. These methods are detailed below:



WEEK ONE

We felt that it was important for this primary session to act as an introduction both to our group and to the activities we would be pursuing over the following weeks. To aid us in this we decided to create a teaching document for the children. This included a picture of Shakespeare, so that the children had an image of the playwright they would be dealing with and a brief summary of theatre and plays in the Elizabethan period. This ensured that this was the main focal point for the pupils when dealing with Shakespeare. The aim behind the document was to give the children a reference package that they could look back on if they needed any additional background or contextual information. Along with this reference material, we included part one of a simplified version of the story of Macbeth. Each week's activities would be based around a section of the plot and so, by restricting the narrative to the first part of the story, we made sure that the children's attention would be focused on that section for that particular day. We decided to begin each week with a reading of the story so that the day's activities could be placed in a context, and by week three the pupils would have a completed narrative of Macbeth that they could refer back to later. The final sheet was an activities for today sheet that outlined the exercises that the children would be doing that afternoon. It split the activities into drama activities and classroom work which emphasised the different ways of approaching a text. They would first of all be expressing themselves through the text and secondly through ideas based on those found within the text. The whole booklet would be complemented with the children's own work throughout the weeks and this would come together to form their own personal record of Macbeth.

Our aim in teaching Macbeth was to implement as many different methods of conveying our four identified local points as possible. We tried to always keep this in mind when planning the activities for the day. To this end, we chose a broad range of exercises and teaching methods, from acting and music to drawing and writing. This in turn helped to emphasis the multi-faceted nature of Shakespeare. Through our activities we tried to show that there are many ways of looking at Shakespeare's works. The first week's activities were to be centred on Macbeth and Banquo's meeting with the witches. This proved ripe for translation into many different interpretative exercises.

We began with drama based activities in the gym, which stressed the fact that performance is a key issue with regard to the study of Shakespeare. We felt the need for warm-up exercises, but did not want them to be unrelated to the rest of our teaching. Therefore we began, as Macbeth does, with a storm. We wished to show that music and sound effects were an intrinsic part of Shakespeare and that an atmosphere can be created through music. This was also a fun and effective way of attracting the children's attention from the outset. We sat in a large circle and began by creating the sound of rain with the fingertips, moved onto stamping feet and clapping hands and reached a crescendo with the clashing of cymbals and banging of drums before the "storm" subsided again. The children were excited and receptive to this introduction and it made them feel at ease with us. We moved onto a different form of warm-up where we asked the children to try to convey various emotions and characters, such as scared, evil, and witchlike, whilst walking and running around the gym. The movement element of this activity was useful in stimulating the children and getting them away from sitting still and receiving information. They were involved in the exercise. The emotions that we asked the children to convey were related to the emotions that the children might need to use in the main drama exercise later.

The main acting activity for week one was to be a performance of a section of the witches' language (chosen by us) from Macbeth, which might incorporate elements such as speech, dance and music. We split into four groups with each of us taking the role of leader of one group. Our function was not to tell the children what to do, but to try and stimulate ideas and to bring those ideas together into a coherent performance. The aim behind this exercise was to bring to the children's attention all that goes into creating a performance such as voice projection, co-operation, timing and making use of actual Shakespearean language. The pupils were very receptive to the superficially difficult nature of Shakespearean language and seemed to enjoy the poetry and rhythmic nature of the words. The children were full of ideas of how to perform this scene and were especially interested in the conveyance of the evil nature of the witches. After rehearsals, each group performed their interpretation of the spell in front of the rest of the class. In this way we introduced the concept of being an audience to the children, but we avoided the danger of their becoming passive receptors because we encouraged their position as being an important and active part of the entire performance. They could also identify with the performance and compare it to their own. Performing in front of a group takes confidence and it was clear that this came more naturally to some children than to others, but all were commited to the activity and seemed to enjoy expressing themselves in this manner. The performances were varied and original and everyone made good use of the musical instruments to enhance the action rather than just using them for the sake of including them. Performing Shakespeare gave them a greater feel for the play and an enjoyment of the language that is not found through simply reading the play in a classroom.

As we wanted to keep a good balance of a variety of activities we returned to the classroom for the second half of the session. Here the emphasis was to be on writing and drawing skills. As the children were returning after break we felt the need for a second "attention grabbing" activity. We wrote an incomplete spell on the blackboard and invited the class as a whole to suggest possible ingredients to complete it. This involved the class in a group activity and it also stimulated their imaginative and language skills. As a bit of fun the ingredients were thrown into a "cauldron" and a mixture of vinegar and baking soda resulted in a bubbling magic spell.

This activity acted as a precursor to the next exercise in which the children wrote their own spell individually. Both the Shakespearean language of the witches' spells and the more contemporary language of the spell we had written on the board acted as inspiration for this activity. The idea was to encourage the children's own use of language and to help them to use Shakespeare as a starting point for their own poetic works. The witches' spells are a good choice for this kind of activity because they display the rich and fluid nature of Shakespeare's text. They could channel him into their own personal and creative thought. This use of Shakespeare becomes apparent when we examine the structure and word use in the children's spell. For example the majority of the children chose to use rhyming couplets throughout their work and some actually chose to use some of Shakespeare's own rhymes; 'Make it double/And watch it bubble'. However, this was mixed with contemporary references to their friends and to 'beer' and 'toxic waste'. This led to an interesting set of spells from the children.

Our final exercise for the day used another medium of expression. Returning to the story sheets, we asked the children to draw their interpretations of the scenes and characters that we had been discussing that day. Returning to the story kept the activities in a context but also helped them to look at it differently in the light of their activities earlier in the day. The pupils used their imagination and drew upon the acting and writing that they had previously done to create their interpretations of the scenes. The first scene they were asked to draw was of Macbeth and Banquo walking in the storm. These generally looked much as would be expected, with the men in armour and having beards. This may have come from their prior knowledge of the period of history or from other representations of Macbeth they may have seen. However, the drawings of the witches resulted in some interesting interpretations. Many went for the traditional vision of witches with pointed hats and long noses, but interestingly some went for more abstract representations showing that they were using their imaginations rather than relying on preconceived ideas.

This concluded the first week's teaching. We felt that it had gone well and that the children had benefited academically as well as having had an enjoyable afternoon. We were happy that we had kept our aims in mind throughout our teaching activities and that we had used a myriad of techniques to implement them. We were surprised but pleased to note the children's enthusiasm and intelligent attitude towards difficult elements such as grappling with the language and their receptivity towards our aims and concepts.



WEEK TWO

At the beginning of the second session we introduced the children to the next instalment of the Macbeth story. We attempted to bring prominent themes to the fore by elaborating upon the text, acting out two scenes which were roughly based upon the play itself. We made it clear that a Shakespeare play was designed to be performed, as well as read. We furthered the idea of performance and, more importantly, that of spectacle that was introduced to the children in week one. We wanted to continue showing how a text 'comes to life' through stage production. We hoped to display, as best we could, how the Shakespearean play exists as an intricate combination of artistic forces and ideas, an energetic juxtaposition of; 'words, voice inflection, facial mimicry, gesture, body movement, make-up, head-dress, costume, accessory, stage design, lighting, music, and noise.'

(Umberto Eco, 'A Semiotics of Theatrical Performance': Literature in the Modern World, Critical Essays and Documents (Ed.) Dennis Walder (Oxford University Press, 1990), p. 115)

A performance prompts thought and therefore at the end of each act we had a "class discussion", in order to make the children think about the issues raised by the actors and actresses. We stressed the importance of individual input, and the impression of each child was deemed equally important. Emphasis was placed upon the role of discourse, because we felt that the children would learn through conversation and experience. Indeed, much of our teaching study was based upon the premise that:

A narrative is communication: hence, it presupposes two parties, a sender and a receiver... Whether the narrative is experienced through a performance or through a text, the members of the audience must respond with an interpretation; they cannot avoid participating in the transaction. They (the children and ourselves) must fill in the gaps...

( Seymour Chatman, 'Story and Narrative': Literature in the Modern World: Critical Essays and Documents, (Ed.) Dennis Walder (Oxford University press, 1990), p. 107)

Our performance began, and we fashioned ourselves into the role of Shakespearean actor/actress and asked the children to play the part of imaginative receptors. We asked them to suspend their disbelief and divorce themselves from any notion of us as people outside of our characters. We acted out the scenes where the killing of King Duncan was conceptualised and realised. The children watched the play intently and displayed a great ability to focus.

Our performances ended with a "scream" which was intended to shock our audience. Instead, the scream came across almost as parody and the children laughed. It seemed that the 'scream' worked to release the tension which surrounded the murder plots. Afterwards we asked the children for their responses and ideas because we wanted them to take what they had learnt from our production, adapt their knowledge and use it productively in their own acting exercise.

In an effort to better acquaint the children with language, character and performance techniques we split them into pairs and made them discuss the murder of Duncan from a specific perspective. One would play the part of Macbeth and the other, Lady Macbeth. The boys were encouraged to play the feminine role and the girls played Macbeth, and the result was a series of interesting cameos which were not defined by gender.

We wanted the children to be aware of other people's perspectives and many pairs were successful in achieving this goal. The dialogue was surprisingly grotesque and some of the body movement and gesture was extraordinarily persuasive. One boy playing Lady Macbeth leaned over and coldly concluded that: 'All you have to do is get a dagger and stab him. We'll be rich forever, but make sure that you put your hand over his mouth or he'll squeal.' Another Lady Macbeth cunningly declared that; 'a drink of wine with instant poison will do the job. If anyone suspects us, we'll blame Banquo.' Some children displayed happiness at what they perceived to be Lady Macbeth's excitement regarding the money and power gained through murder. Many of the Macbeths were tentative and moralistic because the warrior was perceived as a figure disinterested in material gain. Some suggested that Macbeth respected Duncan as a friend and therefore did not wish to murder him.

All of these ideas were acted out and some of the groups performed their dialogues in front of the whole class. The performance was particularly successful because we created a forum which allowed an ousting of emotion. Miss Dronfield, the regular class teacher, told of how one of the quieter children became generally more confident after this particular exercise. He and another child worked in front of about thirty others and afterwards he was proud of his achievement.

The children were also introduced to mime. We sat the whole class in a large circle and told them to pretend they were eating at a banquet. One of the teachers moved around them pretending to be Banquo's ghost. We told the children that they could not see the ghost until they were tapped on the head. He/she then pretended that they could see Banquo. There were a whole range of reactions based upon fear and incredulity. We wanted to show how mime could be a restrictive yet freeing mode of theatricality. A great deal of what might be said in a Shakespeare play is not included in the language of the text, but exists outside in the world of reaction, body movement, gesture and facial mimicry. All of the children enjoyed our 'drama workshop' and we were especially pleased with the children who, overcame their initial fears of performance.

This, we feel, tells us something about the nature of drama. All of the children enjoyed acting, and perhaps this was because drama allows the individual some sort of freedom he/she is denied in formal society. It is therefore more than interesting to note that the acting exercises created an elated atmosphere, rather than the quiet concentration associated with reading and writing in the classroom.

The acting classes involved the adoption of different gender roles, boys experienced playing female roles and vice versa, because we wanted to introduce the children to the Renaissance concept of sexual hierarchy. To announce the role of the boy actor and gain the full attention of the class, Paul dressed up in a skirt and neck-tie and played the part of a Shakespearean lady. The children were obviously amused by this, which made them think about how Shakespearean women were portrayed upon the Renaissance stage:

A central issue of debate about the boy actor has been over whether the convention empowers women, by allowing female characters to adopt freedoms denied them in a patriarchal culture, or whether in the end the disguises serve only to reaffirm the sexual hierarchy....

( Ann Thompson, 'Shakespeare and Sexuality': The Shakespeare Survey: An Annual survey of Shakespeare Studies and Production, Number 4 6, (Ed.) Stanley Wells (Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 6)

The class debated the role of women in the Renaissance and were surprised that they were not allowed upon the stage. They had difficulty in relating and adjusting to the patriarchal situation of Elizabethan England. They believed that if the female parts were acted out properly then they could be dramatically powerful, but also agreed that the boy actor could parody and undermine the role of women. The Shakespeare text was viewed as something which could be moulded into different shapes depending upon which areas of thought one wished to place emphasis. However, it was agreed that in order to carry out a serious feminine portrayal the boy actor must have be a highly skilled figure. It was an interesting contrast to see the girls in our class play the role of Macbeth.

We finished the acting class and took a break before introducing the children to the idea of writing as creation. We hid letters from Macbeth to Lady Macbeth under their desks to surprise them and gain their attention. We asked the children to use language to express their individual responses to a set situation. The children, as Lady Macbeth, were to advise their imaginary husbands about killing King Duncan.

The responses were often logical, intricate and subversive. One child insisted that: 'The witches probably want you to be the king because you are a brave warrior.' Another Lady Macbeth imaginatively suggested that: 'Oil of sleep' could be used to drug King Duncan. Another said: 'Get those spike-balls we got from Duncan for Christmas, shove them under his pillow and they will stick in his head and it would be so hard that it would make his eyes pop out !' Only one child said: 'I think you should not kill Duncan, because they might find out and it is a bad idea... how do you know that you will be a good king ?' These ideas show us that the children were working on a far more subtle level than we realised. They had already indulged in role play and were now adapting their imagination in order to create their own fictional narratives. Some had difficulty putting their emotions into words, but I would argue that all people have this problem regardless of age. It seems that adults and children might work with different vocabularies but suffer from the same problems.

As we intended, the emphasis was always on enjoyment for both pupil and tutor. The Shakespeare play was shown to be multi-dimensional. This was reflected in the many different activities the children were able to participate in and by the sheer volume of material we covered in our two hour seminar. Here, we have elaborated upon the material in order to show the full implications of such a detailed study. We continued to succeed in introducing the children to the importance of interpretation and the myriad layers of meaning involved in a Shakespeare play without confusing or intimidating the children.




WEEK THREE

Having previously broken Macbeth up into sections, and examining them through acting, drawing and writing, the puppet show was another way for the children to explore the play's issues. We felt the need to produce a final activity that would act as a culmination of the different exercises, and so the decision to end our teaching with a puppet show was an appropriate one. We incorporated within it the drama and drawing exercises we had done in the previous weeks, for example, we encouraged the children to draw upon their visualisations of the characters and scenes, in creating the puppets and backgrounds. This enabled the children to see that everyone had a different interpretation of the appearance of each character. This illustrates further how it served as an excellent medium for merging all of the divergent media types we had introduced to the children, into one. The puppet show was not limited to an examination of one or two key scenes, but was rather an innovative method of putting on an entire production.

We divided the play into five acts, which related directly to the structure of the story we had established using the weekly handout. In this manner, the children would immediately be aware of what their part of the story entailed and which characters were involved. We then separated the class into pairs. Each couple would be responsible for designing and creating a certain character or set out of various different materials including cloth and paper. They would then have to work together to decide upon how to best represent their different ideas. To provide continuity in the final performance and to encourage the conception of a communal production, we decided there should only be one puppet for each character. These would be shared between all five groups. This also meant that there were enough characters and sets so that every child could contribute and would ensure that all the class were actively involved in the project. The resulting puppets and scenery were remarkably imaginative and intelligent creations, for example Macbeth's kilt signified their understanding of the Scottish location and the horizontal ghost of Banquo set him apart from the living characters.

After creating the puppets, the children were then split into new groups of five. Each group was assigned the task of staging one of the different acts we had broken the play into. From the outset, we gave each group free reign over how they chose to interpret and recreate the scene. Our presence as group leaders fulfilled the same purpose as it did in the earlier drama activities; to provide a structure for organising their ideas. Since there was only one Macbeth puppet, the different groups had to not only rehearse by improvising the other puppets, but also had to use other people's creations. When one student saw how differently Macduff had been visualised from his own perception of the character, he was very confused and said; "This is Macduff, the mighty warrior? He looks so silly! Who made him?" Yet this forced the children to accept each other's interpretations into their own presentations and so we encouraged them to find different ways to perform around the "silly" limitations of the puppet. The children could use their voices to make Macduff seem more powerful, or make Macduff's movements more bold in the puppet show. We tried to show that there were creative ways to solve what they initially perceived as a problem.

The resulting performances were surprising and original. Although we gave the children an option of narrating their performance using the story sheets, many chose to improvise their own dialogue and include musical percussion to add atmosphere. Even more impressive were two groups that used Shakespeare's original text in their performances. This mix of different approaches created a detailed tapestry of narration methods. The children seemed to understand that there was no one way of telling a story.

This was the first time that the children were given a chance to see Macbeth in its entirety. Since each performing group was only responsible for one scene, they could also see how their part fitted into the whole production.

We videotaped the entire puppet show so the children would be able to watch their own performances at a later date. Being able to criticise their own performances and compare themselves with other groups, helped the children to place Macbeth and their role in the play into a more objective context. The puppet show was a represented a performance collage, with each student contributing their ideas expressed through art and drama. The use of the video allowed the children to see how individual participation enhanced the entire whole.


Conclusions

Our first thoughts on the project were that it was going to be challenging to try to teach Shakespeare to such a young age group, but also we felt that our choice of Macbeth as our primary text included many elements that would be suitable for translation into numerous exciting exercises and activities. As the project progressed our initial impressions proved to be correct. It was a challenge to get away from the critical and theoretical study of Shakespearean plays that we had been previously used to and to strip Macbeth down to its basic components of story and character which would be easiest for the children to grasp. We were surprised at the level of literacy amongst the class, which enabled us to make more use of the actual language of the text and we felt no need to avoid talking about Shakespeare himself as many of the children had receptive and open attitudes towards the prospect of studying him. Our aims in trying to utilise as many different teaching methods and mediums as possible in our tutoring paid off in gaining the children's attention and making Shakespeare seem less one-dimensional. They avoided the possibility of our teaching becoming stale and unoriginal. The puppet show was an excellent example of this as it appealed to the children's desire to create and perform in a less obvious way of teaching. We built a good working relationship both with the class itself and the teacher and this lead to a productive and satisfying project.

The children overcame any stigma associated with Shakespeare because a varied and enjoyable itinerary gave them the freedom to re-create Macbeth in accordance with their own ideas. Our input, as tutors, prompted the children to broaden their outlook by placing Macbeth in its proper multi-dimensional context. The text was shown to be pliable and versatile. Macbeth was de-constructed, revised and reworked through a diverse collaborative interpretation. The puppet show, the apex of our study, collected the various concepts and organised them into a complete work of art. Each child became a producer of Shakespearean drama. Since there are no set rules to govern or restrict the interpretation and production of a Shakespeare play, We feel that the children's ideas are as valid as any I have come across. However, the Macbeth text played the most important role of all, because it provided the nucleus around which enthusiasm and debate revolved. The text offers the children a fantasy to indulge in. A Shakespeare play often contains fanciful and childish elements, and the witches, warlocks and ghosts intrinsic to Macbeth generated an atmosphere of precocious mysticism. Child-like naiveté did not have to be teased out or superimposed, because it exists in the children themselves and as an essential ingredient of the Macbeth text. The play's flexibility also prompted a more intellectual discourse on gender, social ethics and the nature of drama. The issues raised in our debate were similar to those one would expect in adult discussion. The only 'real' difference was that the children used a more basic vocabulary to express themselves. One is always at liberty to extend the discussion into the realms of academic research.

The study was a 'communal undertaking' which fused the childish and intellectual elements of Shakespeare. Although we taught Macbeth the experience was as much a learning experience for us as it was for the children. One could describe the 'children as teachers' because, through them, we gained a different insight into Shakespeare.

Their total engagement in every activity we set, manifested itself not only in the quality of work they evidently produced, but also in the responses we received from the children, and the positive feedback that the teacher related to us. This ranged from the desire to study other Shakespeare plays, to a subtle increase in confidence in some of the more reserved children.

The physical and mental achievements of the children were tremendous, evidence of which is exemplified in their written work and drawings, in addition to their expressive and convincing drama work (some of which can be observed in our multi media journal). The particularly able children could naturally produce work of an incredibly high standard, yet what particularly surprised me was that the efforts of the less able children often created work that was in many cases as imaginative and independent, sometimes more so, as their classmates. This demonstrated to me that our activities had not only been successful, but they had been accessible. We had provided the opportunity for all of the children to express themselves without feeling inferior or intimidated, because the idea of variation that we had committed ourselves to, had invoked a forum through which each child's particular strengths could be offered an occasion to emerge. For example, although one child was not able to express herself exactly as she would wish through writing, her drawing skills were particularly competent. Thus, through the varied activities she could feel she had exhibited her true ability and had been given the chance to utilise her main skills.

The boundless energy and healthy disregard for limitations that their imaginations displayed, was also of incredible inspiration to us, for they followed their own interpretations with determination to the point of re-writing the story of Macbeth itself. This creativity exemplifies a remarkable broadmindedness in children of this age group, it amazed me that they were able to understand the concept of multiple interpretation with such instinctive application. Their awareness that there is never any one way of doing things in drama, music, writing, and art derived largely from the nature of our activities, which outwardly encouraged the need for different and original ideas. Indeed, the actual work itself that they created, suggests to me that this is perhaps the most effective method of invoking not only the production of quality achievements, but also a class of thirty ten year old children expressing a vivacious interest in the issues of a Shakespeare play.